In this ruling you can see that in depth examination of our Georgia voting system has occurred. I have only given it a cursory reading at this time as the order was only issued November 10, but am particularly fond of page 96 in which the Fulton County defendants turn on the state defendants and blame them for forcing use of the Dominion system. The judge acknowledges that while there is law that allegedly requires use of a system statewide, Fulton County had the option of using paper ballots citing a violation of rights is an emergency triggering the option of emergency paper ballots. Nevertheless the judge, I believe in error, excused Fulton County from responsibility for violating rights. By now we are all familiar with Marbury v. Madison, “that a law repugnant to the constitution is void, and that courts, as well as other departments, are bound by that instrument.” It would then seem that the state would be prohibited from a law that contradicts the Constitution which is expounded in the order, and any third party actors woud be protected from being required to comply with law repugnant to the Constitution.

Read/download the Nov 10, 2023 order here.

I filed a Motion to Intervene in Curling this past week piggybacking on Judge Totenberg’s previous order stating that Dominion was illegal but the lone reason for not granting an injunction against its use in 2020 was the nearness of the election. Read/download my motion here.

.

In this affidavit submitted by True The Vote in the indictment case against President Trump, Raffensperger misrepresented the number of votes in question. More importantly he certified an election that should not have been certified. Raffensperger farms out most of his election duties to outside vendors. He says according to this affidavit that the GOP should have been challenging the voter rolls all along. No, Mr. Raffensperger, voter rolls are your job. If you do not want to perform the duties of Secretary of State you should resign. Even now there is effort in Cherokee County to challenge some voter registrations, but the challenges are rejected by the local board of elections. In the Oct. 3 State Election Board meeting a felon charged with voting twice was having to defend that they had not registered to vote and had not voted twice. This is after Secretary Kemp made a lawsuit settlement in which it was agreed Kemp woud abide by the National Voting Rights Act.

All means of registering voters through all laws renders the application to register to vote as just that – an application. Whether applying at DDS, various agencies or organization registration drives, applications are supposed to be checked before they become an actual registration and permit voting. Another part of Mr. Raffensperger’s duties not performed. It does little good to register one to vote that is not legally entitled to vote that dilutes the vote of one legally entitled to vote.

As stated in Duncan v Poythress, (No. 81-7363 United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. Unit B Duncan v. Poythress 657 F.2d 691 (5th Cir. 1981) Decided Nov 13, 1981)”Undeniably the Constitution of the United States protects the right of all qualified citizens to vote, in state as well as in federal elections.” Reynolds v. Sims, 377 U.S. 533, 554, 84 S.Ct. 1362, 1377-78, 12 L.Ed.2d 506 (1964). Qualified citizens not only have a constitutionally protected right to vote, Ex parte Yarbrough, 110 U.S. 651, 45 S.Ct. 152, 28 L.Ed. 274 (1884), but also the right to have their votes counted, United States v. Mosley, 238 U.S. 383, 35 S.Ct. 904, 59 L.Ed. 1355 (1915), a right which can neither be denied outright, Lane v. Wilson, 307 U.S. 268, 59 S.Ct. 872, 83 L.Ed. 1281 (1939), nor destroyed by alteration of ballots, United States v. Classic, 313 U.S. 299, 61 S.Ct. 1031, 85 L.Ed. 1368 (1941), nor diluted by ballot box stuffing, United States v. Saylor, 322 U.S. 385, 64 S.Ct. 1101, 88 L.Ed. 1341 (1944).

We need someone who cares about Georgians and fair elections to make Raffensperger do his job or show him to the door. When one plays cards with a cheater one can not know when they will be cheated. Every office holder or those with political aspirations ought to consider themslves the eventual victim of an untruthful, untrustworthy secretary of state. We can know that for his next trick he will select himself as governor if not stopped.

Mentioned are David Cross, Dr John Eastman, Jeffrey Clark.

Based on the expert opinion and statement below, duplicate slates of electors in a presidential election is normal. The duplicate slate legitimacy, however, is contingent upon a judicial election contest being filed and heard by a tribunal. The case not being heard by a court as was the case in 2020 jumped the tracks of law and history. Dismissing cases is not a hearing of the facts that would allow election decorum to proceed.

Its an old case, but Georgia was previously in the crosshairs of an election question. Whether or not an election was proper is not matter of opinion. It is not a matter of political party. It is a matter of an appropriate investigation and the proper body taking action based on said investigation.

In the beginning of this republic, the founders established a union of loosely connected states. Problems arose from that union when the rubber met the road and realizing the hard won freedom was in jeopardy, the founders owned their mistake in establishment and set out to form a workable constitutional republic. Not only do we have the Constitution and Bill of Rights as the product of their work, we have the constitutional debates detailing how they arrived at their conclusions.

In the debates the founders acknowledged that humans are not always vessels of proper conduct and that had to be addressed in whatever was established. In the current, while there is ample information that the 2020 presidential election was not conducted properly, said information has not received fair consideration in totality and has been rejected on opinion. Elections are the foundation of our country. Everything this country is or shall be flows from properly conducted elections.

Read to see how improper Georgia election was properly handled without questioners being indicted or shamed by the guilty.

This happened in 2022. It was based on improprieties regarding campaign. Ms. Willis only a few days before the Trump indictment relaunched her campaign domation web site. Ms. Willis’s father is John Clifton Ford. He is an attorney also and a Black Panther. One of the largest donors to Ms. Willis’s 2020 campaign was the so called RICO expert advising Ms. Willis, John Ford. As Ms. Willis was raised by her father, the only child of her parent’s union, John Ford could at best/worst be her half brother or some other relation.

With the Fulton County jail having inmates incarcerated in the nasty, infested jail some for years not having yet been indicted, Ms. Willis’s political motivation is clear as well as her failure to do her job. As long as her political longings are satisfied while inmates fight bed bugs waiting to be indicted her cup runneth over.

I am waiting for help from court administrators to get the ruling where the judge did disqualify Ms. Willis from investigating him further. I will post it when it is made available to me.

In the meantime read the Burt Jones filing motion.

In looking at an election suit, Coalition For Good Governance et. al. v. Raffensperger, I count eight (8) lawyers defending six, 5 State Board of Election board members and the Secretary of State. I have observed court cases with the Secretary as a defendant and find that the state interests are always represented by multiple attorneys while aggrieved electors are usually represented by a lone voice.

Secretary Raffensperger inherited several cases from Brian Kemp. I don’t find that Kemp addressed any cases and find that both Kemp and Raffensperger always lawyer up and defend against an aggrieved elector(s). The only case I am aware that Raffensperger settled after an abbreviated defense is Democratic Party of GA, et. al. v. Raffensperger, et. al. in which Raffensperger agreed to change absentee ballot procedures without the benefit of the legislature’s blessing.

What Raffensperger and all 159 county election directors are missing, is when electors get to the point of filing suit their job performance has received a negative review. The people entrusted with transparent elections are employed to protect elections and they more than electors should fire the first shot at anything wrong. Double check me on the number of lawyers in Democtatic Party v. Raffensperger. https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/17088945/coalition-for-good-governance-v-raffensperger/

A concern of a voter expressed to the people whose job it is to address such should not be seen as an attack. The answer should not always be no. No voter should fear voting due to threat of arrest. In election law history, voters were exempt from arrest. While there has to be some rules. Laws, and standards to accomplish an election, poll managers should find a way to address concerns brought to them without escalating the concern into a confrontation. If the answer to concerns is always no, that gives rise to questions about the goals, intents, and purposes of those charged with carrying out elections.

https://americandigitalnews.com/index.php/2022/11/27/brunson-scotus-do-miracles-still-happen-you-decide/

It never ceases to put me in awe when I work or watch a poll. If you are or ever have been an elected official, you owe a debt. If you are a legislator and consider legislating anything about elections without having trained and worked a poll, you are not prepared to do your job and can not truly appreciate having that position. While pollwatching yesterday Oak Ridge Boys This Is America started playing in my head watching the varying people coming to vote. Old, young, black, white, Asian, Hispanic, various origins, beautiful, ugly, lame, hindered, rich, poor, smart and not so much.  We dont like these machines, but when you stand in a voting booth you are never more equal than there. Whatever your status, whatever voting method that counts, you stand with your vote the same as the one next to you or before or after you. The voting booth recognizes only a vote.

One lady walked in with a cane bent over and after sitting to rest while waiting for check in at the poll pad, she had difficulty getting up out of the chair.  One lady was pushed in in a wheel chair.  There were several canes and hindrances. Some went to great difficulty to come cast their ballot on the disliked and untrusted machines. We owe getting this mess straightened out to those who would go to such trouble.  Any person, company, official that would diminish and not protect their vote is not deserving of the benefits of America.  All these different faces are America, each one a piece of the whole.  To have elections even under the best circumstances requires two sides: the voters and the doers.  In stressful times its even harder to get the job done.  One of the workers said the been doing this for a week.  I cant imagine.  When I worked a poll I had to be there at 5:45 a.m.until after 7 or all voters in line voted and the closing poll duties were done. Many people have time and energy invested in whatever elections take place.  It is a shame to waste their efforts on shoddy, unfair equipment or procedures.  We are the best country. We deserve to have the best elections.  I won’t give up, I won’t give in.  You don’t either. Even if you don’t like politics (and I don’t), even if you can’t vote this election, register for next time. Volunteer to work a poll or poll watch. Work on a campaign. Carry your part of America safely and freely to the next generation of the greatest country in the world.  https://youtu.be/qRFaAPdxAfo